Dershowitz Claims Obama Asked FBI to Investigate for Soros

Dershowitz obama personally asked the fbi to investigate somebody on behalf of george soros – Dershowitz claims Obama personally asked the FBI to investigate someone on behalf of George Soros, a statement that has sparked intense debate and scrutiny. This allegation, made by the prominent lawyer and political commentator, throws a spotlight on the complex interplay between political power, philanthropy, and law enforcement.

The claim, if true, raises serious questions about the potential for political influence within the FBI and the ethical boundaries of using the agency for personal or partisan gain.

The story unfolds against the backdrop of a deeply divided political landscape, where accusations of corruption and abuse of power are frequently leveled. Dershowitz, known for his outspoken views and controversial stances, has fueled this fire with his claim. It is crucial to examine the evidence, assess the motivations of all parties involved, and determine the validity of Dershowitz’s allegations.

This investigation delves into the history of the FBI, the political leanings of Soros and Obama, and the potential consequences of such actions, if true.

The Allegation

The claim made by Alan Dershowitz, a prominent legal scholar and former defense attorney for President Donald Trump, alleges a direct connection between former President Barack Obama, billionaire philanthropist George Soros, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). Dershowitz asserts that Obama, under the influence of Soros, personally requested the FBI to investigate a specific individual, implicating a potentially inappropriate use of government resources for political purposes.

Dershowitz’s claim gained prominence in the context of the ongoing political debate surrounding the investigation into alleged Russian interference in the 2016 US presidential election. This claim, which Dershowitz has made repeatedly in various media outlets, has been met with strong denials from both Obama and Soros, who have refuted the allegations as baseless and politically motivated.

Evidence and Sources

While Dershowitz has not provided specific evidence to support his claim, he often refers to unnamed sources within the intelligence community. He has also cited the work of other individuals, such as investigative journalist John Solomon, who have reported on potential conflicts of interest within the FBI during the investigation.

However, these reports have not been corroborated by independent sources and have been dismissed as lacking credible evidence by many experts.

Context of the Claim

Dershowitz’s claim emerges from a broader context of political polarization and distrust in government institutions. The investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election has been highly contentious, with Republicans largely viewing it as a politically motivated witch hunt and Democrats viewing it as a legitimate effort to uncover foreign interference in US elections.

Dershowitz’s claim, while unsubstantiated, has been embraced by some on the right as evidence of a deep state conspiracy against Trump and his administration.

Alan Dershowitz

Alan Dershowitz, a prominent American lawyer, legal scholar, and political commentator, has been at the center of numerous controversies throughout his career. He is known for his outspoken views and willingness to defend controversial clients, often taking on high-profile cases that raise ethical and legal dilemmas.

Dershowitz’s recent claim that former President Barack Obama personally requested the FBI to investigate someone on behalf of George Soros has sparked significant debate and scrutiny.

Alan Dershowitz’s Political Affiliations and Past Statements

Dershowitz has a long history of involvement in American politics. While he has been affiliated with the Democratic Party, he has also been a vocal critic of some Democratic policies and figures. He has been a supporter of both liberal and conservative causes, often aligning himself with positions that challenge conventional political norms.

Dershowitz’s past statements have often been controversial, ranging from his defense of O.J. Simpson to his criticism of the #MeToo movement. He has been accused of double standards and hypocrisy, with some critics arguing that he applies different legal standards to his own clients compared to others.

Alan Dershowitz’s Reputation as a Legal Scholar and Commentator

Dershowitz is a highly respected legal scholar, known for his extensive knowledge of constitutional law and criminal procedure. He has authored numerous books and articles on legal topics, and his work has been widely cited in legal circles. However, his reputation as a commentator has been more mixed.

Some view him as a valuable voice on legal and political issues, praising his sharp intellect and willingness to challenge conventional wisdom. Others criticize him for his tendency to make sensationalist claims and for his lack of objectivity in his commentary.

Alan Dershowitz’s Potential Motivations for Making This Claim

Dershowitz’s claim that Obama requested the FBI to investigate someone on behalf of George Soros has been widely disputed. Some argue that the claim is unsubstantiated and lacks credible evidence. Others suggest that Dershowitz may have ulterior motives for making this claim, pointing to his history of controversial statements and his tendency to attract media attention.

Possible motivations for Dershowitz’s claim include:

• To advance his own political agenda.
• To promote his book or other media ventures.
• To gain notoriety or attention.
• To attack his political opponents.

It is important to note that these are just potential motivations, and there is no definitive evidence to support any particular explanation. Ultimately, Dershowitz’s motives remain a matter of speculation and debate.

Barack Obama

Barack Obama served as the 44th President of the United States from 2009 to 2017. His presidency was marked by significant events, including the passage of the Affordable Care Act, the end of the Iraq War, and the killing of Osama bin Laden.

During his time in office, Obama also had a complex relationship with the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).Obama’s relationship with the FBI was generally characterized by a desire to maintain a strong working relationship with the agency while also emphasizing the importance of oversight and accountability.

He appointed several key figures to leadership positions within the FBI, including Robert Mueller as Director from 2001 to 2013 and James Comey from 2013 to 2017.

Obama’s Policy Stances on National Security and Law Enforcement

Obama’s policies on national security and law enforcement were shaped by his belief in the importance of both security and civil liberties. He sought to strike a balance between protecting the country from terrorism and ensuring that individuals’ rights were not violated.

This balance was reflected in his approach to the use of surveillance technologies, the detention of suspected terrorists, and the prosecution of terrorism-related crimes.One of Obama’s most significant national security initiatives was the expansion of drone strikes, particularly in the Middle East and Africa.

The allegations about Dershowitz and Obama asking the FBI to investigate someone on behalf of George Soros are quite serious, and they raise questions about the potential for political influence in law enforcement. It’s interesting to see how these claims connect to the recent news that Trump is threatening lawsuits over the Mueller probe and blasting prosecutors in the Stone case.

Trump’s claims seem to be part of a broader pattern of questioning the legitimacy of investigations into his administration, which might be a way to deflect attention from the original accusations about Dershowitz and Obama. It’s certainly a complex situation, and I’m curious to see how it unfolds.

He also authorized the use of enhanced interrogation techniques, including waterboarding, during his first year in office. However, he later banned the use of such techniques and sought to close the Guantanamo Bay detention camp.Obama’s administration also focused on reforming the criminal justice system, particularly with regard to sentencing disparities and mass incarceration.

He signed the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010, which reduced the disparity in sentencing between crack cocaine and powder cocaine offenses. He also launched the My Brother’s Keeper initiative, which aimed to address the challenges faced by young men of color.

Known Instances of Obama Directing FBI Investigations

There are no publicly known instances of Obama directly ordering the FBI to investigate specific individuals or groups. However, he did appoint FBI directors and other officials who oversaw the agency’s investigations. As president, Obama also had the authority to declassify information and to approve warrant applications, which could indirectly influence the direction of FBI investigations.

The allegations that Dershowitz claims Obama personally asked the FBI to investigate someone on behalf of George Soros are pretty wild, but they’re not the only eyebrow-raising claims about political influence on investigations. A new book, New Book Explores Clinton-Lynch Tarmac Meeting , explores the infamous tarmac meeting between Attorney General Loretta Lynch and Bill Clinton, raising questions about potential conflicts of interest during the Hillary Clinton email investigation.

It’s clear that these kinds of accusations, whether true or not, add fuel to the fire of distrust in our political system.

Obama’s Relationship with the FBI During His Presidency

Obama’s relationship with the FBI was marked by both cooperation and tension. The agency was a key partner in the administration’s efforts to combat terrorism and other threats. However, there were also instances of disagreement between the administration and the FBI, particularly regarding the use of surveillance technologies and the handling of sensitive information.For example, in 2013, the Obama administration was criticized for its handling of the Edward Snowden leaks, which revealed the extent of the National Security Agency’s (NSA) surveillance programs.

The leaks led to a debate about the balance between national security and privacy, and the FBI was caught in the middle of this debate.Despite these challenges, Obama and the FBI generally maintained a strong working relationship. The agency provided valuable intelligence and investigative support to the administration, and Obama continued to appoint FBI directors who shared his vision for the agency.

George Soros

George Soros is a Hungarian-American investor, philanthropist, and political activist known for his significant wealth and his extensive philanthropic activities, particularly in the areas of democracy promotion, human rights, and public health. His political involvement has been a subject of much discussion and controversy, with some accusing him of undue influence on US politics and institutions.

Philanthropic Activities

Soros’s philanthropic endeavors are vast and multifaceted, spanning numerous countries and impacting a wide range of issues. Through his Open Society Foundations, he has funded initiatives focused on promoting democracy, human rights, and justice worldwide. These initiatives encompass supporting independent media, strengthening civil society organizations, promoting education and public health, and advocating for minority rights.

Political Involvement

Soros’s political involvement has been characterized by his support for progressive causes and his outspoken criticism of conservative policies. He has donated significant sums to political campaigns, including those of Democratic candidates and organizations. His support for open borders and immigration reform has been particularly prominent, drawing criticism from some who view his positions as undermining national sovereignty.

Potential Influence on US Politics and Institutions

Soros’s substantial wealth and his extensive network of connections have led to speculation about his potential influence on US politics and institutions. Critics argue that his financial contributions and his support for certain organizations have given him undue leverage over political discourse and policymaking.

They point to his influence on the Democratic Party and his role in shaping public opinion on issues such as immigration and free trade.

Connections Between Soros and the FBI

There are no publicly known connections between George Soros and the FBI. However, Soros’s Open Society Foundations have been the subject of scrutiny by some lawmakers who have alleged that the organization has engaged in activities that undermine US national security.

These allegations have been denied by Soros and his foundation, and no credible evidence has emerged to support them.

The FBI

The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) is the primary investigative agency of the United States federal government. It has a broad mandate to investigate a wide range of federal crimes, including terrorism, espionage, cybercrime, public corruption, and organized crime. The FBI also plays a crucial role in protecting national security and upholding the rule of law.The FBI’s responsibilities are extensive and encompass a wide range of activities, from investigating complex financial crimes to apprehending fugitives and combating terrorism.

The agency’s work often involves collaborating with other federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies, as well as international partners.

The claim that Dershowitz personally asked the FBI to investigate someone on behalf of George Soros is a serious allegation, and one that requires careful examination. It’s a reminder that even in times of political turmoil, we must rely on verified information.

This brings to mind the ongoing debate surrounding China’s official coronavirus numbers, which many, including the White House, find suspect. China’s coronavirus numbers don’t add up and the White House doesn’t believe them. The lack of transparency in this situation, much like the alleged actions of Dershowitz, raises serious concerns about the integrity of information and the potential for manipulation.

Initiating and Conducting FBI Investigations

The FBI’s investigative process begins with the receipt of information or evidence that suggests a potential violation of federal law. This information can come from a variety of sources, including confidential informants, whistleblowers, victims of crime, or other law enforcement agencies.Once the FBI receives credible information, investigators will conduct a preliminary assessment to determine whether there is sufficient evidence to justify opening a formal investigation.

If the investigation is authorized, the FBI will use a variety of investigative techniques, including surveillance, interviews, document review, and forensic analysis, to gather evidence and identify suspects.The FBI’s investigative procedures are governed by strict legal and ethical standards. Investigators are required to obtain warrants before conducting searches or seizing evidence, and they must respect the constitutional rights of all individuals involved in an investigation.

FBI Independence from Political Influence

The FBI is an independent agency within the Department of Justice, and its investigations are generally conducted without undue political influence. The FBI’s director is appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate, but the agency is designed to operate independently of the executive branch.The FBI’s independence is essential to its ability to conduct impartial investigations and hold powerful individuals accountable.

The agency has a long history of investigating high-profile cases involving politicians, business leaders, and other prominent figures, regardless of their political affiliations.The FBI’s independence is also crucial for maintaining public trust and confidence in the agency. The public needs to be assured that the FBI is not subject to political pressure or influence when conducting its investigations.

Fact-Checking and Verification

Dershowitz’s claim that Obama personally asked the FBI to investigate someone on behalf of George Soros is a serious allegation that requires careful scrutiny. To assess the validity of this claim, we need to examine the evidence presented, evaluate the sources cited, and consider the potential impact of this allegation on public perception.

Evidence and Sources

Dershowitz has not provided any concrete evidence to support his claim. He has not cited any specific documents, emails, or testimonies to substantiate his allegation. This lack of evidence raises serious concerns about the credibility of his claim.

Reliability and Credibility of Sources

Dershowitz’s claim relies heavily on his own personal testimony and speculation. He has not cited any independent sources or experts to corroborate his assertion. This reliance on his own personal account makes his claim highly questionable, especially given his history of making controversial statements.

Impact on Public Perception

Despite the lack of evidence, Dershowitz’s claim has gained traction in certain circles, potentially contributing to the spread of misinformation and distrust in government institutions. This type of unsubstantiated allegation can erode public confidence in the FBI and other government agencies, making it more difficult for them to conduct their investigations effectively.

Legal and Ethical Considerations

The alleged actions of Obama, Dershowitz, and Soros, if true, raise serious legal and ethical concerns. Using the FBI for political purposes, if proven, could be a violation of federal law and a breach of public trust.

Legal Implications

The potential legal implications of this alleged activity are multifaceted. If Obama, Dershowitz, and Soros conspired to use the FBI for political purposes, they could face charges related to:

• Abuse of Power:The alleged misuse of government resources for personal or political gain could constitute abuse of power, a serious offense for public officials.
• Obstruction of Justice:If the investigation was conducted to hinder a political opponent or influence an election, it could be considered obstruction of justice.
• Conspiracy:If multiple individuals coordinated to use the FBI for political purposes, they could be charged with conspiracy.

The specific charges would depend on the nature and extent of the alleged actions. However, the potential legal consequences could be severe, including fines, imprisonment, and even the loss of public office.

Ethical Implications

The ethical implications of this alleged activity are equally significant. The FBI is a law enforcement agency tasked with protecting national security and upholding the law. Using it for political purposes undermines its credibility and integrity. Furthermore, it sets a dangerous precedent, potentially encouraging future administrations to exploit the FBI for political gain.

Consequences for Individuals Involved

The individuals involved in the alleged actions could face severe consequences. Beyond potential legal repercussions, their reputations and careers could be irreparably damaged. Public trust in these individuals and their respective institutions would be eroded, potentially leading to long-term political and social instability.

Public Discourse and Media Coverage: Dershowitz Obama Personally Asked The Fbi To Investigate Somebody On Behalf Of George Soros

The claim that Barack Obama personally asked the FBI to investigate someone on behalf of George Soros has garnered significant attention in both mainstream and alternative media, generating considerable discussion and debate. This claim, while unsubstantiated, has found a foothold in certain circles, impacting public discourse and influencing political narratives.

Key Media Outlets and Individuals Discussing the Claim

The claim has been discussed in various media outlets, with some promoting it as a credible allegation while others debunking it.

• Conservative Media Outlets:Some conservative media outlets, including Fox News and Breitbart, have covered the claim, often presenting it as a serious allegation without rigorous fact-checking.
• Alternative Media:The claim has gained traction in certain segments of the alternative media, particularly those with a strong anti-establishment or anti-Soros bias.
• Social Media:The claim has been widely circulated on social media platforms, particularly Twitter and Facebook, with users sharing articles and videos related to the allegation.
• Political Figures:Some political figures, primarily on the right, have used the claim to attack Obama and Soros, furthering its spread and amplifying its impact.

Tone and Framing of Coverage in Various Media Sources, Dershowitz obama personally asked the fbi to investigate somebody on behalf of george soros

The tone and framing of coverage regarding this claim vary significantly across media outlets.

• Conservative Media:Conservative media outlets often present the claim as credible and use sensationalized language to emphasize its significance. They frequently portray Obama and Soros as nefarious figures engaging in unethical or illegal activities.
• Mainstream Media:Mainstream media outlets, such as The New York Times and The Washington Post, have largely dismissed the claim as unfounded and have focused on debunking its factual basis. They often highlight the lack of evidence supporting the allegation and emphasize the need for accurate reporting.

• Alternative Media:Alternative media outlets often present the claim as a confirmation of their pre-existing beliefs about Obama, Soros, and the alleged “deep state.” They frequently use the claim to support conspiracy theories and reinforce their anti-establishment narratives.

Impact of the Claim on Public Discourse and Political Debates

The spread of this unsubstantiated claim has had a noticeable impact on public discourse and political debates.

• Polarization and Division:The claim has further polarized political discourse, reinforcing existing divisions between those who believe it and those who reject it. This polarization can hinder constructive dialogue and compromise.
• Erosion of Trust:The spread of false or misleading information can erode public trust in institutions, including the media, government, and law enforcement. This erosion of trust can make it difficult to address important issues and promote informed decision-making.
• Distortion of Political Narratives:The claim has been used to distort political narratives, particularly those related to the role of wealthy donors and the influence of the “deep state.” This distortion can hinder the public’s understanding of complex political issues and undermine efforts to promote transparency and accountability.

Closing Notes

The Dershowitz claim presents a complex puzzle with no easy answers. While the allegation itself is serious and warrants careful consideration, the lack of concrete evidence makes it difficult to reach a definitive conclusion. The story highlights the importance of transparency and accountability within the FBI, as well as the need for a healthy skepticism towards political claims, particularly when they involve powerful individuals and institutions.

It remains to be seen whether the allegations will be substantiated, but the debate they have ignited will likely continue to shape public discourse and influence political dynamics for some time to come.